From: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com>
To: ben-linux@fluff.org
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-ibm_iic message can be confusing
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:36:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090417203600.1d0c5cf0@lappy.seanm.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090202120159.2478d7af@lappy.seanm.ca>
Any update on the status of this patch? This patch was acked by Jean.
The patchwork entry is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/21576/ and the
original patch message is below.
Cheers,
Sean
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:01:59 -0500
Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com> wrote:
> This is a trivial patch that does not need to be in 2.6.29. While
> tracking down an EEPROM problem, I found the messages confusing... it
> looked like the EEPROM was being started before the I2C driver!
>
> Here is an example:
>
> at24 0-0052: 512 byte 24c04 EEPROM (writable)
> ibm-iic ef600700.i2c: using standard (100 kHz) mode
> ad7414 0-004a: chip found
>
> It looks like the at24 starts first, then the i2c driver, then the
> ad7414. By moving the message to after the of scan, we always get the
> driver, then the devices.
>
> Cheers,
> Sean
>
> Print the i2c driver message before scanning for devices so that the
> logs show the driver, then the devices. Currently you can get
> device(s), driver, device(s).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c index 88f0db7..7fc0729 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c
> @@ -756,12 +756,12 @@ static int __devinit iic_probe(struct of_device
> *ofdev, goto error_cleanup;
> }
>
> - /* Now register all the child nodes */
> - of_register_i2c_devices(adap, np);
> -
> dev_info(&ofdev->dev, "using %s mode\n",
> dev->fast_mode ? "fast (400 kHz)" : "standard (100
> kHz)");
> + /* Now register all the child nodes */
> + of_register_i2c_devices(adap, np);
> +
> return 0;
>
> error_cleanup:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-18 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-02 17:01 [PATCH] i2c: i2c-ibm_iic message can be confusing Sean MacLennan
2009-02-02 17:29 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 3:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 7:36 ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-18 0:36 ` Sean MacLennan [this message]
2009-04-24 13:10 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090417203600.1d0c5cf0@lappy.seanm.ca \
--to=smaclennan@pikatech.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).