From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2977A51B1B for ; Thu, 7 May 2009 06:40:11 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 13:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090506.134003.261424694.davem@davemloft.net> To: wd@denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1241640919-4650-3-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> References: <1241640919-4650-1-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> <1241640919-4650-3-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kosmo@semihalf.com, jrigby@freescale.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Would you be offended if I tell you that this is a horrible patch submission? Your introductory email indicates 16 patches, yet the series indicates there were 12, and that intro email is only posted to the linuxppc-dev list for people to read. Nobody on netdev nor other interested parties that get CC:'d along the line are able to read what this patch series is about. Since only some patches are CC:'d to netdev I have no idea if I should apply these or they are dependent on some other patches in the series that you didn't send here to netdev. What a mess... how can any maintainer figure out what patch is what, and what tree you expect these patches to even get applied to? I'm definitely sending all of the copies I have received to /dev/null, you need to submit this work properly.