From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64644DDF9B for ; Thu, 7 May 2009 08:09:57 +1000 (EST) To: Scott Wood From: Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] fs_enet: Add MPC5121 FEC support. Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: <4A01F602.2010601@freescale.com> References: <1241640919-4650-1-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> <1241640919-4650-3-git-send-email-wd@denx.de> <4A01F602.2010601@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 00:09:54 +0200 Message-Id: <20090506220954.5D3AF83420E8@gemini.denx.de> Cc: John Rigby , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Piotr Ziecik , Detlev Zundel , netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dear Scott, in message <4A01F602.2010601@freescale.com> you wrote: > > All of the above is duplicative (with even the same names) of stuff in > asm/cpm.h. Beyond just the duplication, what happens if both CPM2 and OK, I can try to reuse the definitions from that file. > 512x are enabled in the same kernel? Hm... both architectures look sufficiently different to me that I don't see sense in trying such a thing. Do you think that needs to be supported? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de "You ain't experienced..." "Well, nor are you." "That's true. But the point is ... the point is ... the point is we've been not experienced for a lot longer than you. We've got a lot of experience of not having any experience." - Terry Pratchett, _Witches Abroad_