From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A77CDDFBA for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 14:45:46 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090512.214540.147824481.davem@davemloft.net> To: rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: question about softirqs From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20090512092348.GA29796@elte.hu> <1242120761.11251.324.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:20:51 -0400 (EDT) > I'm going to be playing around with bypassing the net-rx/tx with my > network drivers. I'm going to add threaded irqs for my network cards and > have the driver threads do the work to get through the tcp/ip stack. > > I'll still keep the softirqs for other cards, but I want to see how fast > it speeds things up if I have the driver thread do it. I think your latency is going to be dreadful.