From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [92.198.50.35]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAB2DDE19 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 17:39:09 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:38:55 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: device trees. Message-ID: <20090512073855.GA3095@pengutronix.de> References: <1242007203.7767.28.camel@concordia> <4A07C664.6040609@dlasys.net> <4A085612.9050602@dlasys.net> <4A089AC8.9080704@dlasys.net> <20090511231915.007AC1430052@mail201-wa4.bigfish.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "David H. Lynch Jr." List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:04:16PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > David: If you would like to have a discussion regarding particular > > design tradeoffs, I'd be happy to, but since I doubt there is anyone on > > this list who is interested in the vagaries of FPGA configuration > > methods, I suggest we have the discussion privately. >=20 > I disagree. There are lots of lurkers on this list who care about > virtex stuff, not to mention non-lurkers like me. :-) I would at > least like to be a fly on the wall of any such discussion. +1 :) --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoJJ48ACgkQD27XaX1/VRtgmgCfRVAOk8Q3Bq8QICBjbQDgUhYG wM4An02+g5gohccP8VviRmd3y/TXb1kN =BrZf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--