From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [92.198.50.35]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB60DE11D for ; Wed, 20 May 2009 06:57:17 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 22:57:06 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Robert Schwebel Subject: Re: mpc5200 fec error Message-ID: <20090519205706.GD27476@pengutronix.de> References: <20090519203645.GW19843@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej" In-Reply-To: <20090519203645.GW19843@pengutronix.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Eric Millbrandt List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:36:45PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: > Wolfram, have you seen this mail? You recently tested -rt on 2.6.29, > right? Did you only test that on the customer hardware or also on the > phyCORE-MPC5200B? So far, I tried only on customer hardware, and that was 2.6.29.2-rt11. With that setup, I could work with NFS flawlessly, no real stress-testing though. Testing latest .3-rt is on my todo, will check the phyCOREs, too. Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoTHSIACgkQD27XaX1/VRtwKACgrn09SfYX0rjGkYNOoghjUm21 +aYAoKy/MnBRJzmkzafO8FVMlBGUO4br =jQcq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej--