From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] can: SJA1000: generic OF platform bus driver
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 02:25:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090526.022508.238274281.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905261010.31364.arnd@arndb.de>
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:10:30 +0100
> On Monday 25 May 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> > Right, that makes sense. However, most drivers use the field to store the
>> > physical address, not the iomap token. Maybe there should be a new field
>> > in struct sja1000_priv for the virtual address, but that would be a change
>> > to the base driver, not just to the OF portion.
>>
>> Is that common practice? If yes, I will add a member to store the
>> virtual address to struct sja1000_priv.
>
> I grepped through the network driver for usage of ->base_addr, and
> it's somewhat inconsistent. The majority of the users use it for
> a physical address, but there are also a few that use it for the
> __iomem token.
>
> Casts between unsigned long and qualified (__iomem, __user, const, ...)
> pointers do not cause a warning, but can easily lead to bugs when
> another user casts to an unqualified pointer.
It's such a baroque thing, there is no reason to set it at all if you
ask me. It's only use is to allow ISA and similar primitive bus
devices to have their I/O ports changed via ifconfig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-26 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 14:46 [net-next-2.6 PATCH v2] can: SJA1000: generic OF platform bus driver Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-22 15:08 ` Grant Likely
2009-05-23 6:29 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-23 16:44 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-25 6:53 ` Grant Likely
2009-05-25 8:15 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-23 11:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-05-23 16:51 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-24 22:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-05-25 6:58 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-26 9:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-05-26 9:25 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-05-26 9:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-05-26 11:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-05-26 14:23 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-30 17:59 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-26 9:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090526.022508.238274281.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).