From: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
paulus@samba.org, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/6] Modify process and processor handling code to recognise hardware debug registers
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:29:40 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090529042940.GE8621@yookeroo.seuss> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090525011650.GE11078@in.ibm.com>
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:46:50AM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> Modify process handling code to recognise hardware debug registers during copy
> and flush operations. Introduce a new TIF_DEBUG task flag to indicate a
> process's use of debug register. Load the debug register values into a
> new CPU during initialisation.
[snip]
> Index: linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip.hbkpt/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> #include <asm/syscalls.h>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> #include <asm/firmware.h>
> +#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
> #endif
> #include <linux/kprobes.h>
> #include <linux/kdebug.h>
> @@ -254,8 +255,10 @@ void do_dabr(struct pt_regs *regs, unsig
> 11, SIGSEGV) == NOTIFY_STOP)
> return;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PPC64
> if (debugger_dabr_match(regs))
> return;
> +#endif
>
> /* Clear the DAC and struct entries. One shot trigger */
> #if defined(CONFIG_BOOKE)
> @@ -372,8 +375,13 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct t
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> + if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(new, TIF_DEBUG)))
> + arch_install_thread_hw_breakpoint(new);
> +#else
> if (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(current_dabr) != new->thread.dabr))
> set_dabr(new->thread.dabr);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_BOOKE)
> /* If new thread DAC (HW breakpoint) is the same then leave it */
> @@ -550,6 +558,10 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
> void exit_thread(void)
> {
> discard_lazy_cpu_state();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> + if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_DEBUG)))
> + flush_thread_hw_breakpoint(current);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
> }
>
> void flush_thread(void)
> @@ -605,6 +617,9 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flag
> struct pt_regs *childregs, *kregs;
> extern void ret_from_fork(void);
> unsigned long sp = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(p) + THREAD_SIZE;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> + struct task_struct *tsk = current;
I don't see any point to adding this variable, just reference current
directly below.
> +#endif
>
> CHECK_FULL_REGS(regs);
> /* Copy registers */
> @@ -672,6 +687,9 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flag
> * function.
> */
> kregs->nip = *((unsigned long *)ret_from_fork);
> +
> + if (unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_DEBUG)))
> + copy_thread_hw_breakpoint(tsk, p, clone_flags);
> #else
> kregs->nip = (unsigned long)ret_from_fork;
> #endif
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-29 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090525004730.944465878@prasadkr_t60p.in.ibm.com>
2009-05-25 1:14 ` [Patch 1/6] Prepare the PowerPC platform for HW Breakpoint infrastructure K.Prasad
2009-05-29 3:20 ` David Gibson
2009-05-29 9:53 ` K.Prasad
2009-05-25 1:15 ` [Patch 2/6] Introduce PPC64 specific Hardware Breakpoint interfaces K.Prasad
2009-05-29 4:18 ` David Gibson
2009-05-29 13:54 ` K.Prasad
2009-05-25 1:16 ` [Patch 3/6] Modify ptrace code to use " K.Prasad
2009-05-25 1:16 ` [Patch 4/6] Modify process and processor handling code to recognise hardware debug registers K.Prasad
2009-05-29 4:29 ` David Gibson [this message]
2009-05-25 1:17 ` [Patch 5/6] Modify Data storage exception code to recognise DABR match first K.Prasad
2009-05-25 1:17 ` [Patch 6/6] Adapt kexec and samples code to recognise PPC64 hardware breakpoint usage K.Prasad
[not found] <20090603162741.197115376@prasadkr_t60p.in.ibm.com>
2009-06-03 16:35 ` [Patch 4/6] Modify process and processor handling code to recognise hardware debug registers K.Prasad
[not found] <20090610090316.898961359@prasadkr_t60p.in.ibm.com>
2009-06-10 9:08 ` K.Prasad
2009-06-17 4:14 ` David Gibson
2009-06-18 17:56 ` K.Prasad
2009-06-19 4:57 ` David Gibson
[not found] <20090726235854.574539012@prasadkr_t60p.in.ibm.com>
2009-07-27 0:18 ` K.Prasad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090529042940.GE8621@yookeroo.seuss \
--to=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).