From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: add an of_genirq driver
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:46:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090614214603.GA24323@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090614192707.GA11003@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1107 bytes --]
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:27:07PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Well, I assume that issues regarding checkpatch do not have the highest
> > priority (especially while the merge-window is open), which is understandable.
>
> Hm, the "merge-window" for new stuff like these patches is pretty much
> already closed, as you didn't send them _before_ the merge window opened
> up. You need to get them to us sooner, so we can test stuff out in the
> -next tree for a while before we can merge them.
Seems you got me wrong here :)
As I stated in the introduction ("PATCH [0/2]"), this patch series is _not_
meant for the current merge-window. I just happened to be done with it now.
With the above sentence I just wanted to give a hint, why there was not a reply
to my checkpatch-mail (as Hans seemed to be concerned about that there was
none).
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-14 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 0:04 [PATCH 0/2] add OF wrapper for uio-pdrv-genirq Wolfram Sang
2009-06-12 0:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] uio/pdrv_genirq: Refactor probe routine to expose a generic part Wolfram Sang
2009-06-14 12:15 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-06-12 0:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] uio: add an of_genirq driver Wolfram Sang
2009-06-14 12:21 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-06-14 17:14 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-06-14 18:33 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-06-14 19:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-06-14 19:23 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-06-14 19:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-06-14 20:34 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-06-14 22:00 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-06-14 23:01 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-06-14 23:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-06-14 23:50 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-06-14 19:27 ` Greg KH
2009-06-14 21:46 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2009-06-14 23:12 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-14 23:45 ` Hans J. Koch
2009-06-15 8:44 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-15 9:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-14 14:40 ` Grant Likely
2009-06-16 9:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-06-16 12:46 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090614214603.GA24323@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hjk@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).