From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411A0B7104 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:46:15 +1000 (EST) Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [92.198.50.35]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B10DDD04 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:46:14 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:46:03 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] uio: add an of_genirq driver Message-ID: <20090614214603.GA24323@pengutronix.de> References: <1244765062-14144-1-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <1244765062-14144-3-git-send-email-w.sang@pengutronix.de> <20090614122136.GD3639@local> <20090614171406.GA1010@pengutronix.de> <20090614183357.GE3639@local> <20090614190533.GA7387@pengutronix.de> <20090614192707.GA11003@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" In-Reply-To: <20090614192707.GA11003@suse.de> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Hans J. Koch" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:27:07PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Well, I assume that issues regarding checkpatch do not have the highest > > priority (especially while the merge-window is open), which is understa= ndable. >=20 > Hm, the "merge-window" for new stuff like these patches is pretty much > already closed, as you didn't send them _before_ the merge window opened > up. You need to get them to us sooner, so we can test stuff out in the > -next tree for a while before we can merge them. Seems you got me wrong here :) As I stated in the introduction ("PATCH [0/2]"), this patch series is _not_ meant for the current merge-window. I just happened to be done with it now. With the above sentence I just wanted to give a hint, why there was not a r= eply to my checkpatch-mail (as Hans seemed to be concerned about that there was none). Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAko1b5sACgkQD27XaX1/VRuqTgCcDl737+mbnMLDUbfJehUaRXeR rOMAn0rMkD4TsDyT8vcs+jx95DnP7yx9 =jvq6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--