From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B25CB724D for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:53:40 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090617.185338.20860763.davem@davemloft.net> To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and reimplement Add SGMII support to UCC GETH From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20090617231306.7051.56146.stgit@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090617231306.7051.56146.stgit@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, ntl@pobox.com, Haiying.Wang@freescale.com, leoli@freescale.com, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Grant Likely Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:15:58 -0600 > (REPOST; I messed up an email address first time around and apparently my > posting got rejected. If you've already received this message, then > I apologize for the noise) > > Here is a fix for the build failure discovered during the 2.6.31 merge > window on ucc_geth.c. I decided to revert and reapply a fixed version > of the patch to make the new version easier to review and bisect if I > got the fixup wrong. I've compile tested both patches, but I do not have > hardware to run test. > > Haiying, please confirm that I haven't horribly trashed your hard work > with my changes. I've applied these to net-next-2.6, thanks!