From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: "M. Mohan Kumar" <mohan@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, miltonm@bga.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not inline putprops function
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:45:52 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090617114551.GA5672@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617113456.GC31595@in.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 05:04:56PM +0530, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
> Do not inline putprops function
>
> With the recent kexec-tools git tree, both kexec and kdump kernels hang (i.e
> kexec -l and kexec -p respectively). This happened after the patch "ppc64:
> cleanups" commit b43a84a31a4be6ed025c1bdef3bb1c3c12e01b16. I tried
> reverting each hunk and then found out that retaining following lines in
> fs2dt.c makes kexec/kdump work.
>
> -static unsigned *dt_len; /* changed len of modified cmdline
> - in flat device-tree */
>
> [....]
>
> - dt_len = dt;
>
> I don't have any clue why removing a unused variable would cause the kexec
> kernel to hang. After further investigation, I observed that if the putprops
> function is not inlined, kexec/kdump kernel would work even after removing
> the above lines.
>
> This patch directs gcc to not inline the putprops function. Now we could
> invoke kexec and kdump kernels.
I'm happy to apply this if you provide a sign-off,
but do you know why not inlining makes a difference here?
> ---
> kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c b/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c
> index 1f551fd..1e01f74 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void add_usable_mem_property(int fd, int len)
> }
>
> /* put all properties (files) in the property structure */
> -static void putprops(char *fn, struct dirent **nlist, int numlist)
> +__attribute__ ((noinline)) static void putprops(char *fn, struct dirent **nlist, int numlist)
> {
> struct dirent *dp;
> int i = 0, fd, len;
> --
> 1.6.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-17 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 11:34 [PATCH] Do not inline putprops function M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-17 11:45 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2009-06-17 11:59 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-17 12:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-06-17 13:04 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-17 13:34 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-17 14:05 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-17 14:26 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-17 14:40 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-23 12:55 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-23 13:56 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-24 0:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-03 5:49 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-05 16:49 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-06 14:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-07 14:35 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-07 14:54 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-10 1:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-10 7:37 ` Milton Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090617114551.GA5672@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).