From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 422D5B7126 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:10:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net (kirsty.vergenet.net [202.4.237.240]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308A1DDDA0 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:10:29 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:45:52 +1000 From: Simon Horman To: "M. Mohan Kumar" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not inline putprops function Message-ID: <20090617114551.GA5672@verge.net.au> References: <20090617113456.GC31595@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20090617113456.GC31595@in.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, miltonm@bga.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 05:04:56PM +0530, M. Mohan Kumar wrote: > Do not inline putprops function > > With the recent kexec-tools git tree, both kexec and kdump kernels hang (i.e > kexec -l and kexec -p respectively). This happened after the patch "ppc64: > cleanups" commit b43a84a31a4be6ed025c1bdef3bb1c3c12e01b16. I tried > reverting each hunk and then found out that retaining following lines in > fs2dt.c makes kexec/kdump work. > > -static unsigned *dt_len; /* changed len of modified cmdline > - in flat device-tree */ > > [....] > > - dt_len = dt; > > I don't have any clue why removing a unused variable would cause the kexec > kernel to hang. After further investigation, I observed that if the putprops > function is not inlined, kexec/kdump kernel would work even after removing > the above lines. > > This patch directs gcc to not inline the putprops function. Now we could > invoke kexec and kdump kernels. I'm happy to apply this if you provide a sign-off, but do you know why not inlining makes a difference here? > --- > kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c b/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c > index 1f551fd..1e01f74 100644 > --- a/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c > +++ b/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c > @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void add_usable_mem_property(int fd, int len) > } > > /* put all properties (files) in the property structure */ > -static void putprops(char *fn, struct dirent **nlist, int numlist) > +__attribute__ ((noinline)) static void putprops(char *fn, struct dirent **nlist, int numlist) > { > struct dirent *dp; > int i = 0, fd, len; > -- > 1.6.0.6