From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FC1B7063 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:58:58 +1000 (EST) Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu (mx2.mail.elte.hu [157.181.151.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F450DDD01 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:58:57 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:58:45 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf_counter: powerpc: Add callchain support Message-ID: <20090627165845.GA20794@elte.hu> References: <19013.44646.549261.100582@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <19013.44722.893263.275594@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1246091684.31755.210.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1246091684.31755.210.camel@twins> Cc: Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 15:31 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > + if (regs) { > > + if (current_is_64bit()) > > + perf_callchain_user_64(regs, entry); > > + else > > + perf_callchain_user_32(regs, entry); > > + } > > Ingo do we need 32 on 64 stuff like that too? hm, indeed. Ingo