From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
broonie@sirena.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] alsa/soc: add locking to mpc5200-psc-ac97 driver
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:18:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090630061847.GA24164@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090629234214.12670.9082.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4049 bytes --]
Hi Grant,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 05:42:21PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>
> AC97 bus register read/write hooks need to provide locking, but the
> mpc5200-psc-ac97 driver does not. This patch adds a mutex around
> the register access routines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> ---
>
> sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c | 1 +
> sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h | 1 +
> sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c
> index efec33a..f0a2d40 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c
> @@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ int mpc5200_audio_dma_create(struct of_device *op)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> spin_lock_init(&psc_dma->lock);
> + mutex_init(&psc_dma->mutex);
> psc_dma->id = be32_to_cpu(*prop);
> psc_dma->irq = irq;
> psc_dma->psc_regs = regs;
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h
> index 2000803..8d396bb 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct psc_dma {
> unsigned int irq;
> struct device *dev;
> spinlock_t lock;
> + struct mutex mutex;
> u32 sicr;
> uint sysclk;
> int imr;
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c
> index 794a247..7eb5499 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_psc_ac97.c
> @@ -34,13 +34,20 @@ static unsigned short psc_ac97_read(struct snd_ac97 *ac97, unsigned short reg)
> int status;
> unsigned int val;
>
> + mutex_lock(&psc_dma->mutex);
> +
> /* Wait for command send status zero = ready */
> status = spin_event_timeout(!(in_be16(&psc_dma->psc_regs->sr_csr.status) &
> MPC52xx_PSC_SR_CMDSEND), 100, 0);
> if (status == 0) {
> pr_err("timeout on ac97 bus (rdy)\n");
> + mutex_unlock(&psc_dma->mutex);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> +
> + /* Force clear the data valid bit */
> + in_be32(&psc_dma->psc_regs->ac97_data);
> +
No mutex involved here. I think this is either a seperate patch or it needs at
least to be mentioned in the patch description.
> /* Send the read */
> out_be32(&psc_dma->psc_regs->ac97_cmd, (1<<31) | ((reg & 0x7f) << 24));
>
> @@ -50,16 +57,19 @@ static unsigned short psc_ac97_read(struct snd_ac97 *ac97, unsigned short reg)
> if (status == 0) {
> pr_err("timeout on ac97 read (val) %x\n",
> in_be16(&psc_dma->psc_regs->sr_csr.status));
> + mutex_unlock(&psc_dma->mutex);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> /* Get the data */
> val = in_be32(&psc_dma->psc_regs->ac97_data);
> if (((val >> 24) & 0x7f) != reg) {
> pr_err("reg echo error on ac97 read\n");
> + mutex_unlock(&psc_dma->mutex);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> val = (val >> 8) & 0xffff;
>
> + mutex_unlock(&psc_dma->mutex);
> return (unsigned short) val;
> }
>
> @@ -68,16 +78,21 @@ static void psc_ac97_write(struct snd_ac97 *ac97,
> {
> int status;
>
> + mutex_lock(&psc_dma->mutex);
> +
> /* Wait for command status zero = ready */
> status = spin_event_timeout(!(in_be16(&psc_dma->psc_regs->sr_csr.status) &
> MPC52xx_PSC_SR_CMDSEND), 100, 0);
> if (status == 0) {
> pr_err("timeout on ac97 bus (write)\n");
> - return;
> + goto out;
> }
> /* Write data */
> out_be32(&psc_dma->psc_regs->ac97_cmd,
> ((reg & 0x7f) << 24) | (val << 8));
> +
> + out:
> + mutex_unlock(&psc_dma->mutex);
> }
>
> static void psc_ac97_warm_reset(struct snd_ac97 *ac97)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-30 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-29 23:42 [PATCH] alsa/soc: add locking to mpc5200-psc-ac97 driver Grant Likely
2009-06-30 0:26 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-30 8:59 ` Mark Brown
2009-06-30 16:53 ` Grant Likely
2009-06-30 6:18 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2009-06-30 13:42 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-30 13:53 ` Mark Brown
2009-07-01 8:56 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-07-01 13:32 ` Jon Smirl
2009-07-01 13:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-07-01 14:44 ` Grant Likely
2009-07-02 13:51 ` Eric Millbrandt
2009-06-30 16:50 ` Grant Likely
2009-06-30 18:33 ` Jon Smirl
2009-06-30 19:08 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090630061847.GA24164@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@sirena.org.uk \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).