linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>,
	Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: Add support for skb recycling
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 00:37:12 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090707203712.GA11157@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A53984A.4050002@hp.com>

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:47:38AM -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >We can reclaim transmitted skbs to use in the receive path, so-called
> >skb recycling support.
> >
> >Also reorder ucc_geth_poll() steps, so that we'll clean tx ring firstly,
> >thus maybe reclaim some skbs for rx.
> 
> Admittedly, all the world is not TCP, but a big chunk is, so are you
> likely to have reference counts go to zero on the tx queue for
> anything other than small standalone TCP ACK segments?

That's a generic question wrt skb recycling, right? Whether we can
always recycle transmitted skbs. No, sometimes (or mostly) we can't.

Initially, I was quite puzzled by this support... looking at how
gianfar driver works (it has the same support as of 0fd56bb5be6455d0),
I noticed that skb_recycle_check() always returns 0, and so we
don't recycle the skbs.

Though, things change when the kernel starts packets forwarding,
*then* skb recycling path actually triggers.

Lennert (skb recycling author) hints us that the gain is indeed
in forwarding/routing workload:

http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-netdev/2008/9/28/3433514

Hope I understood everything correctly. :-)


Thanks!

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-07 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-07 18:38 [PATCH] ucc_geth: Add support for skb recycling Anton Vorontsov
2009-07-07 18:47 ` Rick Jones
2009-07-07 20:37   ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-07-07 20:46     ` Rick Jones
2009-07-08  2:23 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090707203712.GA11157@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=afleming@freescale.com \
    --cc=buytenh@marvell.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=leoli@freescale.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).