From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23720B7089 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:49:33 +1000 (EST) Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com (mtagate5.de.ibm.com [195.212.29.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mtagate5.de.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C5A8DDD01 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:49:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6K7mLj6264336 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:48:21 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6K7mLJA2514964 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:21 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6K7mK4r006521 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:21 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:18 +0200 From: Martin Schwidefsky To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Message-ID: <20090720094818.641e6375@skybase> In-Reply-To: <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> References: <20090715074952.A36C7DDDB2@ozlabs.org> <20090715135620.GD7298@wotan.suse.de> <1248073873.13067.31.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Nick Piggin , Linux-Arch , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Memory Management , Linus Torvalds List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:11:13 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:56 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > I would like to merge the new support that depends on this in 2.6.32, > > > so unless there's major objections, I'd like this to go in early during > > > the merge window. We can sort out separately how to carry the patch > > > around in -next until then since the powerpc tree will have a dependency > > > on it. > > > > Can't see any problem with that. > > CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so > far nobody objected to the patch itself) > > IE. The patch affects all archs, though it's a trivial change every > time, but I'll have stuff in powerpc-next that depends on it, and so I'm > not sure what the right approach is here. Should I put it in the powerpc > tree ? > > I also didn't have any formal Ack from anybody, neither mm folks nor > arch maintainers :-) Well the change is trivial, it just adds another unused argument to the macros. For the records: it still compiles on s390. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.