From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF45B7B6D for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:54:17 +1000 (EST) Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.10.76.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "bilbo.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BE0DDD01 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:54:17 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:51:34 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/perf_counter: Add alignment-faults and emulation-faults sw events Message-ID: <20090727015134.GA18301@kryten> References: <20090706121845.GD4391@kryten> <1248659272.28464.29.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1248659272.28464.29.camel@pasglop> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Ben, > BTW. The patch relies on some perctr changes I don't have in my tree > (PERF_COUNT_SW_ALIGNMENT_FAULTS isn't defined for me) > > Ingo, how do you want to handle that ? Should I wait til round 2 of the > merge window before putting Anton's patch in or can I merge some of your > stuff in powerpc-next as pre-reqs ? Or you can just take Anton's patch > with my: > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > And stick it in your own queue (though pls, give me a pointer to the git > tree in question so I can verify that I don't get new stuff that > conflicts before we get to the merge window). I've got another round of this series that I'll send out today. Anton