From: "M. Mohan Kumar" <mohan@in.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, miltonm@bga.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not inline putprops function
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:24:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090807145405.GB3110@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090807143549.GA3110@in.ibm.com>
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:05:49PM +0530, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After enabling EARLY_DEBUG (and DEBUG in some of the files in
> arch/powerpc/kernel directory), without forcing the dtstruct variable to 8
> byte alignment:
>
> # ./kexec -e
> Starting new kernel
> console [udbg0] enabled
> -> early_setup(), dt_ptr: 0x7723000
> -> early_init_devtree(c000000007723000)
> Invalid tag 5 scanning flattened device tree !
> search "chosen", depth: 0, uname:
> Invalid tag 5 scanning flattened device tree !
> dt_root_size_cells = 2
> dt_root_addr_cells = 2
> Invalid tag 5 scanning flattened device tree !
> reserving: 128c000 -> 5ec1f7
> reserving: 7734000 -> 8cc000
> reserving: 7723000 -> f698
> Phys. mem: 0
> -> move_device_tree
> <- move_device_tree
> Scanning CPUs ...
> Invalid tag 5 scanning flattened device tree !
> <- early_init_devtree()
> Probing machine type ...
> pSeries ...
> No suitable machine found !
>
>
> So device-tree is getting corrupted when dtstruct variable is not aligned to
> 8 byte variable. This problem is not seen with gcc-3.4. Is it compiler
> issue? or bug in the code.
>
I tried writing the device tree to a binary file with and without dt_len and
compared the files after hexdump:
0000 0001 2f00 0000 0000 0003 0000 0004 0000 0001 2f00 0000 0000 0003 0000 0004
0000 0000 0000 0002 0000 0003 0000 0004 0000 0000 0000 0002 0000 0003 0000 0004
0000 000f 0000 0002 0000 0003 0000 0004 0000 000f 0000 0002 0000 0003 0000 0004
0000 001b 3ef1 4800 0000 0003 0000 000d 0000 001b 3ef1 4800 0000 0003 0000 000d
0000 002b 0000 0000 4942 4d2c 3931 3135 | 0000 002b 4942 4d2c 3931 3135 2d35 3035
2d35 3035 0000 0000 0000 0003 0000 0005 | 0000 0000 0000 0003 0000 0005 0000 0036
Regards,
M. Mohan Kumar
>
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 12:24:20AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 22:19 +0530, M. Mohan Kumar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When I align the dtstruct variable to 8 bytes, I am able to invoke kdump.
> > >
> > > When the line
> > > static unsigned dtstruct[TREEWORDS], *dt;
> > > changed to
> > > static unsigned dtstruct[TREEWORDS] __attribute__ ((aligned (8))), *dt;
> > >
> > > kexec-tool works.
> >
> > Hmm, odd.
> >
> > Can you check how it's aligned without your change? ie. in the original
> > binary, is it 4 byte aligned?
> >
> > When you make the change, is the only thing that changes in the binary
> > the alignedness of dtstruct, or does it cause other things to move
> > around?
> >
> > I don't think an unaligned dt blob should have any effect on the kernel,
> > ie. it should copy it in fine, but I'd have to look at the code.
> >
> > cheers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 11:34 [PATCH] Do not inline putprops function M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-17 11:45 ` Simon Horman
2009-06-17 11:59 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-17 12:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-06-17 13:04 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-17 13:34 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-17 14:05 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-17 14:26 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-17 14:40 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-23 12:55 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-06-23 13:56 ` Neil Horman
2009-06-24 0:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-03 5:49 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-05 16:49 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-06 14:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-07 14:35 ` M. Mohan Kumar
2009-08-07 14:54 ` M. Mohan Kumar [this message]
2009-08-10 1:51 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-08-10 7:37 ` Milton Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090807145405.GB3110@in.ibm.com \
--to=mohan@in.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).