From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu (mx2.mail.elte.hu [157.181.151.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74447B7099 for ; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:55:34 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:55:05 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/7] powerpc: use asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h Message-ID: <20090813085505.GA10671@elte.hu> References: <1249448908-18985-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1250142522.3587.110.camel@pasglop> <20090813160625B.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090813074131.GH12143@elte.hu> <1250150981.3587.157.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1250150981.3587.157.camel@pasglop> Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, galak@kernel.crashing.orga List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Ben, what's your preference? I waited for your reaction with these > > bits, i.e. they are not in tip:core/iommu yet. > > Oh I though they were... discard my previous private mail about > missing Ack's then :-) > > I'll review them more in depth hopefully tomorrow but they look > good. Sure - take your time. > > One variant would be what Fujita suggested: you could pull > > core/iommu as a basis (it's a well-tested, problem-free tree at > > the moment, with no big risky items), and then pull/apply the > > powerpc specific bits from Fujita. > > Or we can have the patches in core/iommu and I pull the whole > thing in powerpc-next. [...] Ok! We could also stage it a bit (one or two weeks) in a separate branch and allow a rebase, should you find any bugs during testing? Ingo