From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A99B6F20 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:56:37 +1000 (EST) Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e33.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 641E4DDD01 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:56:36 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7IKsTkj006694 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:54:29 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n7IKuQCi217540 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:56:26 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n7IKuPBC021668 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:56:26 -0600 Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:56:22 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: Becky Bruce Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] powerpc/mm: Cleanup handling of execute permission Message-ID: <20090818205621.GB2530@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <1248766373.30993.50.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: Kumar Gala , linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:39:42PM -0500, Becky Bruce wrote: > Ben, > > This breaks the boot on 8572. I don't know why yet (and I'm probably > not going to figure it out before I go home, because, frankly, it's late > on a Friday afternoon and I need a glass of wine or, perhaps, a beer). > > Kumar and I will poke into this more and let you know what we find out - > in the meantime, if you have any brilliant flashes, pony up! I tested this on a 440EPx NFS rootfs boot too. It doesn't cause init itself to crap out with a SIGILL like Becky's board, but it does do weird things and cause a SIGILL elsewhere during my boot. Reverting this patch from your testing branch allows things to work just fine. josh