From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com (e38.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e38.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8975FB7B6A for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:21:29 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7KJHc79030934 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:17:38 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n7KJKufH200166 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:20:58 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n7KJKtZd022079 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:20:55 -0600 Received: from zod.rchland.ibm.com (sig-9-77-145-175.mts.ibm.com [9.77.145.175]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n7KJKrLq021811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:20:55 -0600 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:20:50 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for the ESTeem 195E (PPC405EP) SBC Message-ID: <20090820192050.GG2530@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <1248448916-29473-1-git-send-email-solomon@linux-wlan.com> <20090730140630.GD10244@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20090730194506.GA30066@linux-wlan.com> <20090730200848.GF10244@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20090817151359.GC8710@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20090820174519.GA8860@linux-wlan.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20090820174519.GA8860@linux-wlan.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: >On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:13:59AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >There is another way. Perhaps you could just copy ppcboot.h to a new file >> >called "hotfoot.h" and just use that. It's a duplication of ppcboot.h to >> >some degree, but it seems to make sense for your board and it helps preserve >> >the "stock" ppcboot.h for other boards. >> >> Solomon, any update on this? As far as I'm concerned, the ppcboot.h issue is >> the only thing that really needs to be reworked before we bring this patch >> in. > >Should I call the new version 'hotfoot.h' or 'ppcboot-hotfoot.h'? Either works for me. josh