linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: Set wakeup capability for I2C and SPI RTC drivers
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:30:10 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090828003010.GA19160@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090827231925.GA1131@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:19:25AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
> > That is why platform code should device_init_wakeup() and
> > drivers should check device_can_wakeup(dev) ...
> 
> They should (and do) check may_wakeup() (i.e. should_wakeup) before
> suspending, not can_wakeup().
> 
> static int ds1374_suspend(struct i2c_client *client, pm_message_t state)
> {
>         if (client->irq >= 0 && device_may_wakeup(&client->dev))
>                 enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
>         return 0;
> }
> 
> (quite funny, they issue enable_irq_wake(), assuming that otherwise
> IRQ line won't trigger CPU wakeup. But in reality, there are interrupt
> controllers that you can't control in that regard: any IRQ activity
> will always resume CPU. And so 'echo disable > /sys/.../wakeup' won't
> guarantee anything. Unreliable, nasty? Could be.)

BTW, of course we can fix this by masking interrupts before
suspending, but nobody actually do this (but should, I think).

And if RTC's IRQ is wired to power switch you're in trouble
without any way to fix this.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-28  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-27 18:22 [PATCH] rtc: Set wakeup capability for I2C and SPI RTC drivers Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-27 21:52 ` David Brownell
2009-08-27 23:19   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-28  0:30     ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-09-22 21:19       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090828003010.GA19160@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).