From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: Set wakeup capability for I2C and SPI RTC drivers
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:30:10 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090828003010.GA19160@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090827231925.GA1131@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:19:25AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
> > That is why platform code should device_init_wakeup() and
> > drivers should check device_can_wakeup(dev) ...
>
> They should (and do) check may_wakeup() (i.e. should_wakeup) before
> suspending, not can_wakeup().
>
> static int ds1374_suspend(struct i2c_client *client, pm_message_t state)
> {
> if (client->irq >= 0 && device_may_wakeup(&client->dev))
> enable_irq_wake(client->irq);
> return 0;
> }
>
> (quite funny, they issue enable_irq_wake(), assuming that otherwise
> IRQ line won't trigger CPU wakeup. But in reality, there are interrupt
> controllers that you can't control in that regard: any IRQ activity
> will always resume CPU. And so 'echo disable > /sys/.../wakeup' won't
> guarantee anything. Unreliable, nasty? Could be.)
BTW, of course we can fix this by masking interrupts before
suspending, but nobody actually do this (but should, I think).
And if RTC's IRQ is wired to power switch you're in trouble
without any way to fix this.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-28 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-27 18:22 [PATCH] rtc: Set wakeup capability for I2C and SPI RTC drivers Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-27 21:52 ` David Brownell
2009-08-27 23:19 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-28 0:30 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-09-22 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090828003010.GA19160@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).