linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Hu Mingkai-B21284 <Mingkai.Hu@freescale.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben@fluff.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdhci-devel@lists.ossman.eu,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/85xx: Add eSDHC support for MPC8536DS boards
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:19:53 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090828151953.GA14776@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73839B4A0818E747864426270AC332C304438438@zmy16exm20.fsl.freescale.net>

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 07:02:51PM +0800, Hu Mingkai-B21284 wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:24:17PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Aug 18, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > 
> > > >This patch simply adds sdhci node to the device tree.
> > > >
> > > >We specify clock-frequency manually, so that eSDHC will 
> > work without 
> > > >upgrading U-Boot. Though, that'll only work for default setup (1500
> > > >MHz) on new board revisions. For non-default setups, it's 
> > recommended 
> > > >to upgrade U-Boot, since it will fixup clock-frequency 
> > automatically.
> > > >
> > > >Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
> > > 
> > > out of interest the 85xx eSDHC don't need the sdhci,wp-inverted 
> > > property?
> > 
> > Yes, eSDHC controllers in MPC85xx report normal state in its 
> > registers.
> > 
> 
> Hi Anton,
> 
> The eSDHC controller in different silicon version on MPC8536  reports
> different WP state in the register PRSSTAT:

Thanks a million for the heads up!

Yes, the manual I used ("MPC8536ERM Rev. 0 10/2008") doesn't mention
that, but the newer manual that I just downloaded ("MPC8536ERM Rev. 1
05/2009") does.

[...]
> For silicon 1.0,  the macro SDHCI_QUIRK_INVERTED_WRITE_PROTECT is also
> defined,
> so the dirver will report the error WP state in function sdhci_get_ro.

Not any longer. We don't actually define it for any 85xx CPUs.

I need to think how should we handle all these WP inversions. :-)

So, we have inversion in BCSR (depending on the BCSR revision),
configurable inversion in CPU via GENCFGR for 1.1 silicon, and
non-configurable non-inverted reporting for 1.0 silicon...

Do you know if there are any plans to fix the WP inversion for
MPC8569E-MDS boards, or make something like GENCFGR for MPC8569
CPUs?

Thanks,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-28 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-07 19:57 [PATCH v2 0/7] sdhci-of: Some fixes for high-speed and 4-bit SD cards Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-07 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/7] sdhci-of: Fix SD clock calculation Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-07 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/7] sdhci-of: Avoid writing reserved bits into host control register Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-07 19:58 ` [PATCH 3/7] sdhci-of: Fix high-speed cards recognition Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-07 19:58 ` [PATCH 4/7] powerpc: Introduce and document sdhci,wp-inverted property for eSDHC Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-07 19:58 ` [PATCH 5/7] sdhci-of: Don't hard-code inverted write-protect quirk Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-07 19:58 ` [PATCH 6/7] sdhci-of: Cleanup eSDHC's set_clock() a little bit Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-07 19:58 ` [PATCH 7/7] powerpc/85xx: Add eSDHC support for MPC8536DS boards Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-11 13:48   ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-18 23:38     ` [PATCH v2] " Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-19  1:24       ` Kumar Gala
2009-08-19  1:51         ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-08-28 11:02           ` Hu Mingkai-B21284
2009-08-28 15:19             ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-08-31  7:51               ` Hu Mingkai-B21284
2009-08-25 14:44       ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090828151953.GA14776@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=Mingkai.Hu@freescale.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben@fluff.org \
    --cc=david.vrabel@csr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
    --cc=sdhci-devel@lists.ossman.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).