From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bamako.nerim.net (bamako.nerim.net [62.4.17.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4939B7BDC for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:34:36 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:34:34 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: Joakim Tjernlund Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: Do not generate STOP after read. Message-ID: <20090928093434.57157435@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: References: <1253620242-18461-1-git-send-email-Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> <4ABC94ED.6070508@grandegger.com> <20090928092809.7272b6e6@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Esben Haabendal , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:30:32 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote on 28/09/2009 09:28:09: > > > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:26:54 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > Jean, I just noticed you pull request for i2c on LKML but I didn't see this > > > patch nor have I got any feedback from you. What is your view? > > > > My view is that i2c-mpc is nor under my jurisdiction, so I did not, and > > will not, pay any attention to it. > > Ah, that explains it. Who then will look after i2c-mpc? Kumar? What does MAINTAINERS say? -- Jean Delvare