LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	bernhard.weirich@riedel.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable-review@kernel.org,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, RFeany@mrv.com
Subject: [patch 27/30] powerpc: Fix incorrect setting of __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:31:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091001233322.806126675@mini.kroah.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091001233504.GA17709@kroah.com>


2.6.30-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Weirich, Bernhard <Bernhard.Weirich@riedel.net>

[I'm going to fix upstream differently, by having all CPU types
actually support _PAGE_SPECIAL, but I prefer the simple and obvious
fix for -stable. -- Ben]

The test that decides whether to define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL on
powerpc is bogus and will end up always defining it, even when
_PAGE_SPECIAL is not supported (in which case it's 0) such as on
8xx or 40x processors.

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Weirich <bernhard.weirich@riedel.net>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>


---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pte-common.h
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ extern unsigned long bad_call_to_PMD_PAG
 #define HAVE_PAGE_AGP
 
 /* Advertise support for _PAGE_SPECIAL */
-#ifdef _PAGE_SPECIAL
+#if _PAGE_SPECIAL != 0
 #define __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL
 #endif
 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-01 23:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20091001233116.947658905@mini.kroah.org>
     [not found] ` <20091001233504.GA17709@kroah.com>
2009-10-01 23:31   ` [patch 26/30] powerpc/8xx: Fix regression introduced by cache coherency rewrite Greg KH
2009-10-01 23:31   ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091001233322.806126675@mini.kroah.org \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=RFeany@mrv.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bernhard.weirich@riedel.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox