From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Rob Landley To: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Merge common OpenFirmware device tree code Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 02:09:58 -0500 References: <20091007041007.16890.62194.stgit@angua> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200910070209.59311.rob@landley.net> Cc: Stephen Rothwell , monstr@monstr.eu, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tuesday 06 October 2009 23:49:04 Grant Likely wrote: > > However, I've completely devoted to this work for at least the next > two months, so there are plenty more patches to follow. Once I've > got all the common code merged between Microblaze, PowerPC and Sparc > I'll be fix the endian problems and making it easily usable by other > architectures like ARM and MIPS. Lots of work to be done. Is there any news on getting QEMU to parse a device tree to figure out what hardware to emulate? (I.E. using the device tree code to let qemu provide configurable board emulations instead of hardwiring them in C code?) Also, what would be involved in getting x86 to (at least have the option to) use the device tree stuff? Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds