From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp04.in.ibm.com (e28smtp04.in.ibm.com [59.145.155.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e28smtp04.in.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F6ECB7063 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:07:22 +1100 (EST) Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by e28smtp04.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n9CA7GHl000575 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:37:16 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9CA7FYx2490586 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:37:15 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n9CA7E4g028952 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:07:15 +1100 Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:31:31 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Arun R Bharadwaj Subject: Re: [v8 PATCH 0/8]: cpuidle: Cleanup cpuidle/ Introduce cpuidle to POWER Message-ID: <20091012100131.GA3007@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20091008094828.GA20595@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <20091008094828.GA20595@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Arjan van de Ven Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Arun R B [2009-10-08 15:18:28]: > Hi > > Please consider this for inclusion into the testing tree. > > This patchset introduces cpuidle infrastructure to POWER, prototyping > for pSeries, and also does a major refactoring of current x86 idle > power management and a cleanup of cpuidle infrastructure. > > Earlier discussions on the same can be found at: > > v7 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/6/278 > v6 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/180 > v5 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/26 > v4 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/1/133 > v3 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/27/124 > v2 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/26/233 > v1 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/19/150 > > I looked at the changes and they are beginning to look very good. Some minor comments about comments in the individual patches. -- Balbir