From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106CAB7088 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:40:12 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:40:02 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Felix Radensky Subject: Re: UBIFS problem on MPC8536DS Message-ID: <20091019154002.GC19074@loki.buserror.net> References: <4AD5ADC9.30503@embedded-sol.com> <4AD5C5B4.3060303@nokia.com> <4AD5D053.9000901@embedded-sol.com> <4AD5FFE7.7080703@nokia.com> <4AD60EF4.4080306@embedded-sol.com> <4AD614E4.6030005@freescale.com> <4AD7811A.6040501@freescale.com> <4AD7FE37.1060705@embedded-sol.com> <20091016153128.GA11838@loki.buserror.net> <4ADAE205.7070106@embedded-sol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4ADAE205.7070106@embedded-sol.com> Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Adrian Hunter List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote: > Hi, Scott > > Scott Wood wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 07:01:43AM +0200, Felix Radensky wrote: >>> Thanks for confirmation. So the real problem is eLBC ? >>> What happens if I access other devices on eLBC (e.g. FPGA) >>> simultaneously with NAND or NOR ? >> >> AFAICT, the problem is NAND being accessed simultaneously with anything else >> on the eLBC (at least GPCM -- not sure about UPM). Instead of delaying the >> memory-like transaction until the NAND special operation has completed, it >> seems to just abort the NAND operation. >> >> eLBC can't really tell the difference whether you've got NOR or FPGA hooked >> up to a GPCM chip select, so the problem should still apply. >> > > Can you please provide some code example of synchronizing GPCM and NAND ? I don't have any. It's something that would have to be written. -Scott