From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-fx0-f221.google.com (mail-fx0-f221.google.com [209.85.220.221]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E42B7BA3 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:21:44 +1100 (EST) Received: by fxm21 with SMTP id 21so8101174fxm.9 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:21:38 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: John Kacur Subject: Re: [PATCH] macintosh: Explicitly set llseek to no_llseek in ans-lcd Message-ID: <20091021212137.GB4880@nowhere> References: <20091010153314.827301943@linutronix.de> <20091010153349.966159859@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , LKML , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:07:18PM +0200, John Kacur wrote: > From 0c2b412cdccf73bdeb19bb866bfe556942eaeca2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: John Kacur > Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:01:12 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] macintosh: Explicitly set llseek to no_llseek in ans-lcd > > Now that we've removed the BKL here, let's explicitly set lleek to no_llseek > > Signed-off-by: John Kacur > --- > drivers/macintosh/ans-lcd.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/ans-lcd.c b/drivers/macintosh/ans-lcd.c > index 4ae8ec9..a1a1bde 100644 > --- a/drivers/macintosh/ans-lcd.c > +++ b/drivers/macintosh/ans-lcd.c > @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ const struct file_operations anslcd_fops = { > .write = anslcd_write, > .unlocked_ioctl = anslcd_ioctl, > .open = anslcd_open, > + .llseedk = no_llseek, llseedk? :) Should we better pushdown default_llseek to every to every file operations that don't implement llseek? I don't know how many of them don't implement llseek() though. That said we can't continue anymore with this default attribution of default_llseek() on new fops.