linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Arun Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [v9 PATCH 4/9]: x86: refactor x86 idle power management code and remove all instances of pm_idle.
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:25:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091026075550.GB17689@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091023160711.GB1431@ucw.cz>

* Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> [2009-10-23 18:07:11]:

> On Fri 2009-10-16 15:13:08, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
> > * Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-10-16 15:08:50]:
> > 
> > This patch cleans up x86 of all instances of pm_idle.
> > 
> > pm_idle which was earlier called from cpu_idle() idle loop
> > is replaced by cpuidle_idle_call.
> > 
> > x86 also registers to cpuidle when the idle routine is selected,
> > by populating the cpuidle_device data structure for each cpu.
> > 
> > This is replicated for apm module and for xen, which also used pm_idle.
> > 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c      |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/process.c     |   90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c  |    3 -
> >  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c  |    3 -
> >  arch/x86/xen/setup.c          |   40 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |    9 ++--
> >  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c     |   16 +++++--
> >  7 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> ...
> > +static int local_idle_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_state *st)
> > +{
> > +	ktime_t t1, t2;
> > +	s64 diff;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	t1 = ktime_get();
> > +	local_idle();
> > +	t2 = ktime_get();
> > +
> > +	diff = ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(t2, t1));
> > +	if (diff > INT_MAX)
> > +		diff = INT_MAX;
> > +	ret = (int) diff;
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> So we get this routine essentially 3 times. Is there no way to share
> the code?
> 

We can move this code to a common place, but that would mean exporting
the idle function pointer to be called from within this routine, which
is exactly what we wanted to avoid.

Any suggestions are welcome.

arun

> -- 
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-26  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-16  9:38 [v9 PATCH 0/9]: cpuidle: Cleanup cpuidle/ Introduce cpuidle to POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:40 ` [v9 PATCH 1/9]: cpuidle: Design documentation patch Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:41 ` [v9 PATCH 2/9]: cpuidle: cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:42 ` [v9 PATCH 3/9]: cpuidle: implement a list based approach to register a set of idle routines Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:43 ` [v9 PATCH 4/9]: x86: refactor x86 idle power management code and remove all instances of pm_idle Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-23 16:07   ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-26  7:55     ` Arun R Bharadwaj [this message]
2009-10-26  7:58       ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-26  8:25         ` Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:44 ` [v9 PATCH 5/9]: POWER: enable cpuidle for POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:45 ` [v9 PATCH 6/9]: pSeries/cpuidle: refactor pseries idle loops Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:46 ` [v9 PATCH 7/9]: POWER: add a default_idle idle loop for POWER Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:47 ` [v9 PATCH 8/9]: pSeries: implement pSeries processor idle module Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-10-16  9:48 ` [v9 PATCH 9/9]: POWER: Enable default_idle when power_save=off Arun R Bharadwaj
2009-11-16 10:36 ` [v9 PATCH 0/9]: cpuidle: Cleanup cpuidle/ Introduce cpuidle to POWER Arun R Bharadwaj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091026075550.GB17689@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).