From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Cc: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@freescale.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Fleming Andy-AFLEMING <afleming@freescale.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Do not call skb recycling with disabled IRQs
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:53:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091105175316.GA27099@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1N66Jp-0004Y0-8Q@jdl.com>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:40:21AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
[...]
> > >+ netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
> >
> > Will this not lead to locking all the tx queues even though at this
> > point we are working on a "particular queue" ?
>
> Similar but different question: What version is this patch based upon?
> I can't find:
>
> > >index 197b358..a0ae604 100644
>
> My search of 2.6.31 up through current linux head (v2.6.32-rc6-26-g91d3f9b)
> and benh's current head (94a8d5caba74211ec76dac80fc6e2d5c391530df) do not
> have a version of this code with separate txqueues.
>
> I confess I'm not too familiar with the history here, so I don't know
> if that feature is in flux, or came, or went, or what.
Sorry for not mentioning, it's based on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git
+ compiler/sparse warnings fixes that I sent yesterday.
> That boils down to: I can't directly apply your patch, but I could
> hand-fudge its intent, but only on a single tx queue variant.
Here is the patch on top of the Linus' git tree, if you haven't
already 'back-ported' the previous patch.
diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
index 5bf31f1..5dca99c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -1274,7 +1274,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
u32 lstatus;
int i;
u32 bufaddr;
- unsigned long flags;
unsigned int nr_frags, length;
base = priv->tx_bd_base;
@@ -1298,14 +1297,11 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
/* total number of fragments in the SKB */
nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->txlock, flags);
-
/* check if there is space to queue this packet */
if ((nr_frags+1) > priv->num_txbdfree) {
/* no space, stop the queue */
netif_stop_queue(dev);
dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
}
@@ -1403,9 +1399,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
/* Tell the DMA to go go go */
gfar_write(&priv->regs->tstat, TSTAT_CLEAR_THALT);
- /* Unlock priv */
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
-
return NETDEV_TX_OK;
}
@@ -1915,17 +1908,14 @@ static int gfar_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
struct net_device *dev = priv->ndev;
int tx_cleaned = 0;
int rx_cleaned = 0;
- unsigned long flags;
/* Clear IEVENT, so interrupts aren't called again
* because of the packets that have already arrived */
gfar_write(&priv->regs->ievent, IEVENT_RTX_MASK);
- /* If we fail to get the lock, don't bother with the TX BDs */
- if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&priv->txlock, flags)) {
- tx_cleaned = gfar_clean_tx_ring(dev);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
- }
+ netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
+ tx_cleaned = gfar_clean_tx_ring(dev);
+ netif_tx_unlock_bh(priv->ndev);
rx_cleaned = gfar_clean_rx_ring(dev, budget);
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-05 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 22:57 [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Make polling safe with IRQs disabled Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 14:01 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 14:20 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 14:41 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 15:43 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 16:57 ` [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Do not call skb recycling with disabled IRQs Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 17:23 ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-05 17:34 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 17:40 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 17:53 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-11-06 20:38 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 17:53 ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-08 9:08 ` David Miller
2009-11-09 13:41 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-08 9:05 ` [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Make polling safe with IRQs disabled David Miller
2009-11-09 13:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091105175316.GA27099@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=B05799@freescale.com \
--cc=afleming@freescale.com \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=jdl@jdl.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).