linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Cc: Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@freescale.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Fleming Andy-AFLEMING <afleming@freescale.com>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Do not call skb recycling with disabled IRQs
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:53:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091105175316.GA27099@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1N66Jp-0004Y0-8Q@jdl.com>

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:40:21AM -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote:
[...]
> > >+			netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
> > 
> > Will this not lead to locking all the tx queues even though at this
> > point we are working on a "particular queue" ?
> 
> Similar but different question:  What version is this patch based upon?
> I can't find:
> 
>     > >index 197b358..a0ae604 100644
> 
> My search of 2.6.31 up through current linux head (v2.6.32-rc6-26-g91d3f9b)
> and benh's current head (94a8d5caba74211ec76dac80fc6e2d5c391530df) do not
> have a version of this code with separate txqueues.
> 
> I confess I'm not too familiar with the history here, so I don't know
> if that feature is in flux, or came, or went, or what.

Sorry for not mentioning, it's based on

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git
+ compiler/sparse warnings fixes that I sent yesterday.

> That boils down to:  I can't directly apply your patch, but I could
> hand-fudge its intent, but only on a single tx queue variant.

Here is the patch on top of the Linus' git tree, if you haven't
already 'back-ported' the previous patch.

diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
index 5bf31f1..5dca99c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -1274,7 +1274,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	u32 lstatus;
 	int i;
 	u32 bufaddr;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int nr_frags, length;
 
 	base = priv->tx_bd_base;
@@ -1298,14 +1297,11 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	/* total number of fragments in the SKB */
 	nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->txlock, flags);
-
 	/* check if there is space to queue this packet */
 	if ((nr_frags+1) > priv->num_txbdfree) {
 		/* no space, stop the queue */
 		netif_stop_queue(dev);
 		dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
 		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
 	}
 
@@ -1403,9 +1399,6 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	/* Tell the DMA to go go go */
 	gfar_write(&priv->regs->tstat, TSTAT_CLEAR_THALT);
 
-	/* Unlock priv */
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
-
 	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 }
 
@@ -1915,17 +1908,14 @@ static int gfar_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	struct net_device *dev = priv->ndev;
 	int tx_cleaned = 0;
 	int rx_cleaned = 0;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Clear IEVENT, so interrupts aren't called again
 	 * because of the packets that have already arrived */
 	gfar_write(&priv->regs->ievent, IEVENT_RTX_MASK);
 
-	/* If we fail to get the lock, don't bother with the TX BDs */
-	if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&priv->txlock, flags)) {
-		tx_cleaned = gfar_clean_tx_ring(dev);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->txlock, flags);
-	}
+	netif_tx_lock_bh(priv->ndev);
+	tx_cleaned = gfar_clean_tx_ring(dev);
+	netif_tx_unlock_bh(priv->ndev);
 
 	rx_cleaned = gfar_clean_rx_ring(dev, budget);
 

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-05 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-04 22:57 [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Make polling safe with IRQs disabled Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 14:01 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 14:20   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 14:41     ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 15:43       ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 16:57         ` [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Do not call skb recycling with disabled IRQs Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 17:23           ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-05 17:34             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-05 17:40             ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 17:53               ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-11-06 20:38                 ` Jon Loeliger
2009-11-05 17:53               ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-08  9:08           ` David Miller
2009-11-09 13:41             ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-08  9:05 ` [PATCH RFC] gianfar: Make polling safe with IRQs disabled David Miller
2009-11-09 13:32   ` Anton Vorontsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091105175316.GA27099@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=B05799@freescale.com \
    --cc=afleming@freescale.com \
    --cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=jdl@jdl.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).