From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [92.198.50.35]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793A5B7BB0 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:44:30 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:44:25 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpc5200/gpt: tiny fix for gpt period limitation Message-ID: <20091112214425.GD13350@pengutronix.de> References: <18304285.1257929369240.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail19.ha2.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0" In-Reply-To: Cc: Albrecht =?iso-8859-15?Q?Dre=DF?= , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > up patch 3. BUT, you're on my shit list. Patch 2 in your series Huh, are you in a bad mood today? IMHO he addressed some valid issues; and = we all had to start somewhere regarding the workflow. I know that manually adapting patches is annoying, but this wording sounds quite strong... --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkr8gbkACgkQD27XaX1/VRsFggCbBeuRa7xfA132EmuFNc31xfvo 6wIAoJJ/dNqbfF3dnVR7v/mEq/cfOtpA =jYFT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d9ADC0YsG2v16Js0--