From: Torsten Fleischer <to-fleischer@t-online.de>
To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: spi_mpc8xxx.c: chip select polarity problem
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:20:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911181720.06390.to-fleischer@t-online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117232823.GA19058@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
On Wen, Nov 18, 2009 00:28:23 Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
> > > > > So it might be better to fix up initial value in the platform code?
> > > >
> > > > Oh, we actually cannot, because the driver calls
> > > > gpio_direction_output().
> > > >
> > > > And since we don't know the mode prior to SPI device's driver
> > > > probe() finished, we'll have to set up an initial state in the
> > > > first SPI transfer. I.e. something like this:
> > >
> > > In most cases the device drivers perform SPI transfers already in their
> > > probe() function. How can it be ensured that the CS of all other
> > > devices are inactive even if they are not initialized at that time?
> >
> > Good question. Oh, well... then we have to use spi-cs-high,
> > no matter that it is a duplication of the 'compatible' property.
> > SPI bus drivers don't know all the devices and their CS level,
> > and so spi-cs-high is the only way to tell that information. :-(
>
> Oh. On the other hand, we can postpone the gpio_direction_output()
> call, and still require that the platform code (or firmware)
> should be responsible for setting a sane default values on the
> chip selects.
>
How about that?
diff -u -r -N linux-2.6.31.6_orig//drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c linux-2.6.31.6/drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c
--- linux-2.6.31.6_orig//drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c 2009-11-10 01:32:31.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.31.6/drivers/spi/spi_mpc8xxx.c 2009-11-18 10:47:06.000000000 +0100
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@
u32 rx_shift; /* RX data reg shift when in qe mode */
u32 tx_shift; /* TX data reg shift when in qe mode */
u32 hw_mode; /* Holds HW mode register settings */
+ int initialized;
};
static inline void mpc8xxx_spi_write_reg(__be32 __iomem *reg, u32 val)
@@ -437,6 +438,7 @@
cs = kzalloc(sizeof *cs, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cs)
return -ENOMEM;
+ cs->initialized = 0;
spi->controller_state = cs;
}
mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
@@ -503,15 +505,25 @@
return ret;
}
+
+static void mpc8xxx_spi_cs_init(struct spi_device *spi);
+
+
static int mpc8xxx_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
struct spi_message *m)
{
struct mpc8xxx_spi *mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
+ struct spi_mpc8xxx_cs *cs = spi->controller_state;
unsigned long flags;
m->actual_length = 0;
m->status = -EINPROGRESS;
+ if (cs && !cs->initialized) {
+ mpc8xxx_spi_cs_init(spi);
+ cs->initialized = 1;
+ }
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&mpc8xxx_spi->lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&m->queue, &mpc8xxx_spi->queue);
queue_work(mpc8xxx_spi->workqueue, &mpc8xxx_spi->work);
@@ -671,6 +683,17 @@
gpio_set_value(gpio, on ^ alow);
}
+static void mpc8xxx_spi_cs_init(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+ struct device *dev = spi->dev.parent;
+ struct mpc8xxx_spi_probe_info *pinfo = to_of_pinfo(dev->platform_data);
+ u16 cs = spi->chip_select;
+ int gpio = pinfo->gpios[cs];
+ bool on = (pinfo->alow_flags[cs] ^ !(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
+
+ gpio_direction_output(gpio, on);
+}
+
static int of_mpc8xxx_spi_get_chipselects(struct device *dev)
{
struct device_node *np = dev_archdata_get_node(&dev->archdata);
@@ -720,14 +743,6 @@
pinfo->gpios[i] = gpio;
pinfo->alow_flags[i] = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
-
- ret = gpio_direction_output(pinfo->gpios[i],
- pinfo->alow_flags[i]);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(dev, "can't set output direction for gpio "
- "#%d: %d\n", i, ret);
- goto err_loop;
- }
}
pdata->max_chipselect = ngpios;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-18 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-16 16:42 spi_mpc8xxx.c: chip select polarity problem Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-16 17:10 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-16 18:00 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-17 20:09 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-17 20:22 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-17 23:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-18 16:20 ` Torsten Fleischer [this message]
2009-11-18 23:29 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-21 8:45 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-21 16:08 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-25 0:33 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-25 20:41 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-25 22:11 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 12:12 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-26 17:27 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-11-26 18:18 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 18:16 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 18:41 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-26 18:50 ` Grant Likely
2009-11-26 19:01 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-26 19:17 ` Grant Likely
2009-12-09 15:49 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-12-09 17:46 ` Grant Likely
2009-12-09 19:13 ` Torsten Fleischer
2009-12-14 16:54 ` Torsten Fleischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911181720.06390.to-fleischer@t-online.de \
--to=to-fleischer@t-online.de \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).