hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

[Will Schmidt]

The tb_total and purr_total values reported via the hcall_stats code
should be cumulative, rather than being replaced by the latest delta tb
or purr value. 

Tested-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>

---
[ This is a touch-up to the "[3/6] powerpc: tracing: Add hypervisor call
tracepoints" patch submitted by Anton a few weeks back, so I've copied
folks Anton had on CC for his original patch, this fix is rather ppc
specific, so can probably go in via the ppc tree, but I've no real
preference. ]

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall_inst.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall_inst.c
index 2f58c71..1fefae7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall_inst.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall_inst.c
@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ static void probe_hcall_exit(unsigned long opcode, unsigned long retval,
 
 	h = &__get_cpu_var(hcall_stats)[opcode / 4];
 	h->num_calls++;
-	h->tb_total = mftb() - h->tb_start;
-	h->purr_total = mfspr(SPRN_PURR) - h->purr_start;
+	h->tb_total += mftb() - h->tb_start;
+	h->purr_total += mfspr(SPRN_PURR) - h->purr_start;
 
 	put_cpu_var(hcall_stats);
 }

Re: hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:12 -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:

> Tested-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>

Isn't it assumed that the one that made the patch also tested it? Well I
would hope that is the norm.

-- Steve

Re: hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

[Anton Blanchard]

Hi Will,

> The tb_total and purr_total values reported via the hcall_stats code
> should be cumulative, rather than being replaced by the latest delta tb
> or purr value. 
> 
> Tested-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>

Ouch! Nice catch.

Acked-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>

Anton

> [ This is a touch-up to the "[3/6] powerpc: tracing: Add hypervisor call
> tracepoints" patch submitted by Anton a few weeks back, so I've copied
> folks Anton had on CC for his original patch, this fix is rather ppc
> specific, so can probably go in via the ppc tree, but I've no real
> preference. ]
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall_inst.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall_inst.c
> index 2f58c71..1fefae7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall_inst.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall_inst.c
> @@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ static void probe_hcall_exit(unsigned long opcode, unsigned long retval,
>  
>  	h = &__get_cpu_var(hcall_stats)[opcode / 4];
>  	h->num_calls++;
> -	h->tb_total = mftb() - h->tb_start;
> -	h->purr_total = mfspr(SPRN_PURR) - h->purr_start;
> +	h->tb_total += mftb() - h->tb_start;
> +	h->purr_total += mfspr(SPRN_PURR) - h->purr_start;
>  
>  	put_cpu_var(hcall_stats);
>  }
> 

Re: hypervisor call tracepoints hcall_stats touchup.

[Will Schmidt]

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 16:19 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 10:12 -0600, Will Schmidt wrote:
> 
> > Tested-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Isn't it assumed that the one that made the patch also tested it? Well I
> would hope that is the norm.

I like to make that assumption, but wanted to be clear on the point for
anyone with doubts. :-)


> 
> -- Steve
> 
>