LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org
Subject: Make the kernel accept ePAPR style phandle information
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:16:42 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091126051641.GB27334@yookeroo> (raw)

Grant, this is based on your test-devicetree branch, if it could be
merged via there would be great.

Currently when processing flattened device trees, the kernel expects
the phandle in a property called "linux,phandle".  The ePAPR spec -
not being Linux specific - instead requires phandles to be encoded in
a property named simply "phandle".  This patch makes the kernel accept
either form when unflattening the device tree.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Index: working-2.6/drivers/of/fdt.c
===================================================================
--- working-2.6.orig/drivers/of/fdt.c	2009-11-26 09:58:06.052792325 +1100
+++ working-2.6/drivers/of/fdt.c	2009-11-26 10:00:08.309570256 +1100
@@ -314,10 +314,19 @@ unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(u
 		pp = unflatten_dt_alloc(&mem, sizeof(struct property),
 					__alignof__(struct property));
 		if (allnextpp) {
-			if (strcmp(pname, "linux,phandle") == 0) {
+			/* We accept flattened tree phandles either in
+			 * ePAPR-style "phandle" properties, or the
+			 * legacy "linux,phandle" properties.  If both
+			 * appear and have different values, things
+			 * will get weird.  Don't do that. */
+			if ((strcmp(pname, "phandle") == 0)
+			    || (strcmp(pname, "linux,phandle") == 0)) {
 				if (np->phandle == 0)
 					np->phandle = *((u32 *)*p);
 			}
+			/* And we process the "ibm,phandle" property
+			 * used in pSeries dynamic device tree
+			 * stuff */
 			if (strcmp(pname, "ibm,phandle") == 0)
 				np->phandle = *((u32 *)*p);
 			pp->name = pname;


-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

             reply	other threads:[~2009-11-26  5:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-26  5:16 David Gibson [this message]
2009-11-26  5:46 ` Make the kernel accept ePAPR style phandle information Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091126051641.GB27334@yookeroo \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox