From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25308B7BEB for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:06:47 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 20:59:49 -0600 From: Olof Johansson To: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add PowerPC patterns Message-ID: <20091205025949.GA29554@lixom.net> References: <20091202091951.5ec6bb83@hyperion.delvare> <1259894454.2076.1246.camel@pasglop> <20091204103434.0a754925@hyperion.delvare> <1259920775.2076.1273.camel@pasglop> <1259947019.22783.116.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1259947019.22783.116.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Cc: linuxppc-dev , LKML , Jean Delvare , Paul Mackerras , Colin Leroy , "Darrick J. Wong" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 09:16:59AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 20:59 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:34 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > I've sent it to linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org on October 14th. This is the > > > address which is listed 22 times in MAINTAINERS. If it isn't correct, > > > then please update MAINTAINERS. > > No it's fine both shoul work. Your patches are there, just waiting for > > me to pick them up, I was just firing a reminder to the rest of the CC > > list :-) (and I do remember fwd'ing a couple of your patches to the > > list, for some reason they didn't make it to patchwork back then, that > > was a few month ago). > > Anyways, I've been stretched thin with all sort of stuff lately, so bear > > with me if I'm a bit slow at taking or testing stuff, I'm doing my best. > > Adding patterns to the PowerPC sections of MAINTAINERS is useful. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Acked-by: Olof Johansson There are a few other files under arch/powerpc that's not under platforms that belongs to the pasemi code but it's not a big deal to not include them. This goes most of the way. -Olof