[PATCH] Re: ZILOG serial port broken in 2.6.32

[Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>]

On Sunday 06 December 2009 19:10:48 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 01:01 -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Trying again with a few likely-looking cc's from the MAINTAINERS file:
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> > The PMACZILOG serial driver last worked in 2.6.28.  It was broken by
> > commit f751928e0ddf54ea4fe5546f35e99efc5b5d9938 by Alan Cox making bits
> > of the tty layer dynamically allocated.  The PMACZILOG driver wasn't
> > properly converted, it works with interrupts disabled (for boot
> > messages), but as soon as interrupts are enabled (PID 1 spawns) the next
> > write to the serial console panics the kernel.
>
> Ah looks like I missed that... I'll dig. Thanks for the report.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.

Ok, here's the fix.  It's not the _right_ fix, but it Works For Me (tm) and I'll
leave it to you guys to figure out what this _means_:

Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>

diff -ru build/packages/linux/drivers/serial/serial_core.c build/packages/linux2/drivers/serial/serial_core.c
--- build/packages/linux/drivers/serial/serial_core.c	2009-12-02 21:51:21.000000000 -0600
+++ build/packages/linux2/drivers/serial/serial_core.c	2009-12-08 06:17:06.000000000 -0600
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
 static void uart_tasklet_action(unsigned long data)
 {
 	struct uart_state *state = (struct uart_state *)data;
-	tty_wakeup(state->port.tty);
+	if (state->port.tty) tty_wakeup(state->port.tty);
 }
 
 static inline void

That one line workaround makes the panic go away, and things seem to work fine from there.

I note that pmac_zilog.c function pmz_receiv_chars() has the following chunk:

        /* Sanity check, make sure the old bug is no longer happening */
        if (uap->port.state == NULL || uap->port.state->port.tty == NULL) {
                WARN_ON(1);
                (void)read_zsdata(uap);
                return NULL;
        }

Which doesn't catch this because it's the write code path (not the read code path) that's running into 
this.

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds