From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.linux-foundation.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9D2B6EF4 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:45:40 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:45:05 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: 2.6.33 -next tree Message-Id: <20091208144505.af1dd7a3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1260311383.16132.4.camel@pasglop> References: <1260311383.16132.4.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev , David Brownell , Stephen Rothwell List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:29:43 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 14:33 -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > > > > Are you able to pull this tree, or should I ask Linus to pull it > > directly? > > > > It contains mpc5200 and xilinx stuff. Some of it is SPI related, but > > I'm now the SPI co-maintainer, so I have no problem with it going in > > via your tree. :-) Regardless, I want to get it out to Linus ASAP. > > > > This tree has also been in linux-next for a while now, so it should be > > a safe pull. > > I'll pull it, I'll pull it, stop nagging :-) > ooh, does nagging work?