From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [213.79.90.228]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A5CB7BC3 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:17 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:00:15 +0300 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Dave Liu Subject: Re: ucc_geth: Fix the wrong the Rx/Tx FIFO size Message-ID: <20091209230015.GA13654@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <1259309803-5474-1-git-send-email-daveliu@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <1259309803-5474-1-git-send-email-daveliu@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 04:16:43PM +0800, Dave Liu wrote: > current the Rx/Tx FIFO size settings cause problem > when four UEC ethernets work simultaneously. > > eg: GETH1, UEM-J15, GETH2, UEC-J5 on 8569MDS board > > $ ifconfig eth0 10.193.20.166 > $ ifconfig eth1 10.193.20.167 > $ ifconfig eth2 10.193.20.168 > then > $ ifconfig eth3 10.193.20.169 > > The fourth ethernet will cause all of interface broken, > you cann't ping successfully any more. > The patch fix this issue for MPC8569 Rev1.0 and Rev2.0 > > Signed-off-by: Dave Liu Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov Thanks Dave! I see that the new values actually match the QEIWRM spec (except UTFS... spec recommends 2048, but it also says that it might differ for different memory setups, though that's a separate issue). And FWIW, I did some quick netperf tests on MPC8360, and the patch doesn't cause any problems. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2