From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:56:09 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20091210.135609.124000757.davem@davemloft.net> To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca Subject: Re: Deprecating of_platform, the path from here... From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20091209.161550.168794100.davem@davemloft.net> <20091209.162121.256573183.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, jk@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Grant Likely Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:47:33 -0700 > Trying to go the other way around (deprecate platform and encouraging > of_platform instead) I don't think will gain much traction; whereas I > think bringing of_platform features into platform will be an easier > sell. I'm trying to be pragmatic here. When people use words like "traction" and "pragmatic" that means they are making decisions for reasons other than technical ones. :-)