From: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@br.ibm.com>,
Torez Smith <torez@us.ibm.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC:PATCH 02/03] powerpc: Add definitions for Debug Registers on BookE Platforms
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:53:44 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091211005344.GB8852@yookeroo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091210155721.6697.40863.sendpatchset@norville.austin.ibm.com>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 01:57:21PM -0200, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> powerpc: Add definitions for Debug Registers on BookE Platforms
>
> From: Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This patch adds additional definitions for BookE Debug Registers
> to the reg_booke.h header file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Torez Smith <lnxtorez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
As with patch 1/3, none of the comments below is anything that
couldn't be fixed up after merging. So,
Acked-by: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@br.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev list <Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
> ---
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 30 +++++-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg_booke.h | 176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
[snip]
> + /*
> + * The following will contain addresses used by debug applications
> + * to help trace and trap on particular address locations.
> + * The bits in the Debug Control Registers above help define which
> + * of the following registers will contain valid data and/or addresses.
> + */
> + unsigned long iac1;
> + unsigned long iac2;
> + unsigned long iac3;
> + unsigned long iac4;
> + unsigned long dac1;
> + unsigned long dac2;
> + unsigned long dvc1;
> + unsigned long dvc2;
I think you'd make the logic in patch 3 substantially easier, if you
defined these as
unsigned long iac[4];
unsigned long dac[2];
unsigned long dvc[2];
instead of as individual structure members.
[snip]
> +#define DBCR0_USER_DEBUG (DBCR0_IDM | DBCR0_ICMP | DBCR0_IAC1 | \
> + DBCR0_IAC2 | DBCR0_IAC3 | DBCR0_IAC4)
> +#define DBCR0_BASE_REG_VALUE 0
These constants are left over from when the interface allowed
more-or-less direct access to the debug regs. I don't think the
USER_DEBUG constant is used at all any more, and the BASE_REG_VALUE is
just used in the load_default function, and might as well be inline
there.
[snip]
> +
> +#define dbcr_iac_range(task) ((task)->thread.dbcr0)
Hrm, I think the way these macros work to do the 40x vs. BookE
abstration is kind of ugly. But an unequivocally better way doesn't
immediately occur to me.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-11 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-10 15:57 [RFC:PATCH 00/03] powerpc: Expose BookE debug registers through extended ptrace interface Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-10 15:57 ` [RFC:PATCH 01/03] powerpc: Extended " Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 0:44 ` David Gibson
2009-12-11 2:51 ` Kumar Gala
2009-12-10 15:57 ` [RFC:PATCH 02/03] powerpc: Add definitions for Debug Registers on BookE Platforms Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-10 17:07 ` Josh Boyer
2010-01-18 22:07 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 0:53 ` David Gibson [this message]
2009-12-11 1:31 ` Dave Kleikamp
2010-01-18 22:10 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 2:41 ` Kumar Gala
2009-12-11 3:28 ` David Gibson
2009-12-11 14:35 ` Kumar Gala
2009-12-14 1:16 ` David Gibson
2009-12-10 15:57 ` [RFC:PATCH 03/03] powerpc: Add support for BookE Debug Reg. traps, exceptions and ptrace Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-10 17:27 ` Josh Boyer
2009-12-10 17:41 ` Josh Boyer
2009-12-10 18:05 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 2:50 ` Kumar Gala
2010-01-18 22:18 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 3:26 ` David Gibson
2010-01-18 22:31 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 2:23 ` [RFC:PATCH 00/03] powerpc: Expose BookE debug registers through extended ptrace interface Kumar Gala
2009-12-11 2:27 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 20:07 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2009-12-11 20:51 ` Kumar Gala
2010-01-18 22:34 ` Dave Kleikamp
2010-02-03 2:03 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 2:24 ` Kumar Gala
2009-12-11 2:29 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-12-11 2:32 ` Kumar Gala
2009-12-12 4:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-12-11 2:45 ` Kumar Gala
2010-01-18 22:41 ` Dave Kleikamp
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-18 21:57 Dave Kleikamp
2010-01-18 21:59 ` [RFC:PATCH 02/03] powerpc: Add definitions for Debug Registers on BookE Platforms Dave Kleikamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091211005344.GB8852@yookeroo \
--to=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=bauerman@br.ibm.com \
--cc=sergiodj@br.ibm.com \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torez@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox