From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, Netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] can: mscan-mpc5xxx: add support for the MPC521x processor
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:22:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100104172209.GC4665@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B421CDB.4010902@grandegger.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3693 bytes --]
> Nice. Just for curiosity, what clock and frequency does it select on
> your board? It should be listed when the driver is loaded.
Using this simple dts-snipplet
mscan@1300 {
compatible = "fsl,mpc5121-mscan";
cell-index = <0>;
interrupts = <12 8>;
interrupt-parent = < &ipic >;
reg = <0x1300 0x80>;
};
I get this output:
mpc5xxx_can 80001300.mscan: using 'sys_clk' with frequency divider 25
mpc5xxx_can 80001300.mscan: MSCAN at 0xe1064300, irq 16, clock 16000000 Hz
mpc5xxx_can 80001380.mscan: using 'sys_clk' with frequency divider 25
mpc5xxx_can 80001380.mscan: MSCAN at 0xe106c380, irq 17, clock 16000000 Hz
> > My idea was: it might be nice to save both #else-branches and the if-clause in
> > probe() which calls this get_clock() or the other (and then another in case
> > there will be a new mpc5xyz-user in the future). And replace it with some
> > mpc5xxx_custom_init() which is taken from of_device_id->data. No big issue,
> > though; no show-stopper.
>
> You mean like in the i2c-mpc driver:
>
> http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v2.6.32/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c#L585
Yes.
> No problem, if I handle the regs property inside the mpc5121-specific
> function. The #ifdef's are for *space saving*. If nobody else than me
> cares, I will remove them.
I'd be fine with keeping them.
> >>>> +
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MPC512x
> >>>> +struct mpc512x_clockctl {
> >>>> + u32 spmr; /* System PLL Mode Reg */
> >>>> + u32 sccr[2]; /* System Clk Ctrl Reg 1 & 2 */
> >>>> + u32 scfr1; /* System Clk Freq Reg 1 */
> >>>> + u32 scfr2; /* System Clk Freq Reg 2 */
> >>>> + u32 reserved;
> >>>> + u32 bcr; /* Bread Crumb Reg */
> >>>> + u32 pccr[12]; /* PSC Clk Ctrl Reg 0-11 */
> >>>> + u32 spccr; /* SPDIF Clk Ctrl Reg */
> >>>> + u32 cccr; /* CFM Clk Ctrl Reg */
> >>>> + u32 dccr; /* DIU Clk Cnfg Reg */
> >>>> + u32 mccr[4]; /* MSCAN Clk Ctrl Reg 1-3 */
> >>>> +};
> >
> > I wonder if this (and the occurence in clock.c) should be factored out and
> > moved to asm/mpc5xxx.h?
>
> I was thinking about that as well but mpc5xxx.h seems not (yet) to be a
> popular place to store mpc5xxx related definitions.
Probably because the mpc5121 is not very popular when it comes to mainline
activity. (BTW, I also wondered why it is not named mpc512x.h as I'd think
mpc5xxx is for common stuff between mpc5200 and mpc5121. But this is another
issue, not relevant here.)
> > One further note: I couldn't spot any code handling Rev1 of the MPC5121? Do you
> > plan to add such code? If not, we should at least put a comment that it is
> > missing. The binding documentation should be updated as well, as you can't use
> > all options on such revisions.
>
> Do we have rev1 support in the mainline kernel? I also understood that
> there are only a few devel boards out there with v1 CPUs. If necessary,
> this could be fixed later on demand. But it should be documented, e.g.
> in the KConfig and dts bindings doc, of course.
Yup, documenting it will do.
> Did you have a chance to test bus-off recovery? I just realized one
> issue if the device is stopped while in bus-off.
Sorry, I just did basic transfer-tests as I am currently busy with other
projects.
> Will come up with a v2 patch soon...
Please do an s/latetr/latter/ before posting it :)
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-04 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-02 8:17 [PATCH net-next 0/3] can: mscan-mpc5xxx: add support for the Freescale MPC512x Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-02 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] can: mscan: fix improper return if dlc < 8 in start_xmit function Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-02 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] can: mscan-mpc5xxx: add support for the MPC521x processor Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-02 8:17 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] powerpc/mpc5xxx: add OF platform binding doc for FSL MSCAN devices Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-02 14:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-01-02 13:57 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] can: mscan-mpc5xxx: add support for the MPC521x processor Wolfram Sang
2010-01-02 16:08 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-04 12:49 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-04 16:24 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-01-04 16:52 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-04 17:22 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2010-01-04 17:35 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-04 19:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-01-04 20:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2010-01-02 13:30 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] can: mscan: fix improper return if dlc < 8 in start_xmit function Wolfram Sang
2010-01-02 15:34 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-02 13:27 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] can: mscan-mpc5xxx: add support for the Freescale MPC512x Wolfram Sang
2010-01-02 15:32 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100104172209.GC4665@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=Devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=Netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=Socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=wg@denx.de \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).