From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Wu Jiajun-B06378 <B06378@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ucc_geth: Fix empty TX queue processing
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:52:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100111105248.GA28580@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <100CB1A1877FF245BDB7AF83A0E73FFE26BE4D@zch01exm28.fsl.freescale.net>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:47:37AM +0800, Wu Jiajun-B06378 wrote:
>
> 'bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]' has two possible statuses: 1)full queue.
> 2)empty queue.
> Removing 'netif_queue_stopped() == 0' will make transmitting stopping
> when the queue is full.
>
> I made a new patch for this oops.
[...]
> + if ((bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]) && (skb == NULL))
> break;
Hm. I wonder why do we need the 'bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]' check
at all? The null skb will cause a kernel oops anyway.
I think the patch below should be sufficient for the fix.
Can you try it? Or if you tell me how to reproduce the issue
you observe, I can try it myself.
Thanks a lot!
diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
index 41ad2f3..a1a6d06 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
@@ -3279,13 +3279,12 @@ static int ucc_geth_tx(struct net_device *dev, u8 txQ)
/* Handle the transmitted buffer and release */
/* the BD to be used with the current frame */
- if (bd == ugeth->txBd[txQ]) /* queue empty? */
+ skb = ugeth->tx_skbuff[txQ][ugeth->skb_dirtytx[txQ]];
+ if (!skb)
break;
dev->stats.tx_packets++;
- skb = ugeth->tx_skbuff[txQ][ugeth->skb_dirtytx[txQ]];
-
if (skb_queue_len(&ugeth->rx_recycle) < RX_BD_RING_LEN &&
skb_recycle_check(skb,
ugeth->ug_info->uf_info.max_rx_buf_length +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-11 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0A1FE637C2C7E148B9573BB60CC630E56C3E90@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net>
2010-01-11 3:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] ucc_geth: Fix empty TX queue processing Wu Jiajun-B06378
2010-01-11 10:52 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2010-01-11 11:52 ` Wu Jiajun-B06378
2009-12-24 15:30 [PATCH 0/3] ucc_geth: Some more fixes Anton Vorontsov
2009-12-24 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] ucc_geth: Fix empty TX queue processing Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100111105248.GA28580@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=B06378@freescale.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).