From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@denx.de>,
Devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] i2c-mpc: use __devinit[data] for initialization functions and data
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:08:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100127150801.GC6090@fluff.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5F37FA.8060809@grandegger.com>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:44:10PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 09:55:04PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> >> From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@denx.de>
> >>
> >> "__devinit[data]" has not yet been used for all initialization functions
> >> and data. To avoid truncating lines, the struct mpc_i2c_match_data has
> >> been renamed to mpc_i2c_data, which is even the better name.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@denx.de>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> >> index f627001..2cb864e 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> >> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct mpc_i2c_divider {
> >> u16 fdr; /* including dfsrr */
> >> };
> >>
> >> -struct mpc_i2c_match_data {
> >> +struct mpc_i2c_data {
> >> void (*setclock)(struct device_node *node,
> >> struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> u32 clock, u32 prescaler);
> >> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int i2c_wait(struct mpc_i2c *i2c, unsigned timeout, int writing)
> >> }
> >>
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx
> >> -static const struct mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_52xx[] = {
> >> +static const struct __devinitdata mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_52xx[] = {
> >> {20, 0x20}, {22, 0x21}, {24, 0x22}, {26, 0x23},
> >> {28, 0x24}, {30, 0x01}, {32, 0x25}, {34, 0x02},
> >> {36, 0x26}, {40, 0x27}, {44, 0x04}, {48, 0x28},
> >> @@ -186,7 +186,8 @@ static const struct mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_52xx[] = {
> >> {10240, 0x9d}, {12288, 0x9e}, {15360, 0x9f}
> >> };
> >>
> >> -int mpc_i2c_get_fdr_52xx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock, int prescaler)
> >> +static int __devinit mpc_i2c_get_fdr_52xx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock,
> >> + int prescaler)
> >> {
> >> const struct mpc_i2c_divider *div = NULL;
> >> unsigned int pvr = mfspr(SPRN_PVR);
> >> @@ -215,9 +216,9 @@ int mpc_i2c_get_fdr_52xx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock, int prescaler)
> >> return div ? (int)div->fdr : -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
> >> - struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> - u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
> >> + struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> + u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> {
> >> int ret, fdr;
> >>
> >> @@ -230,15 +231,15 @@ static void mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
> >> dev_info(i2c->dev, "clock %d Hz (fdr=%d)\n", clock, fdr);
> >> }
> >> #else /* !CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx */
> >> -static void mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
> >> - struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> - u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx(struct device_node *node,
> >> + struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> + u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> {
> >> }
> >> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_MPC52xx*/
> >>
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_SOC
> >> -static const struct mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_8xxx[] = {
> >> +static const struct __devinitdata mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_8xxx[] = {
> >> {160, 0x0120}, {192, 0x0121}, {224, 0x0122}, {256, 0x0123},
> >> {288, 0x0100}, {320, 0x0101}, {352, 0x0601}, {384, 0x0102},
> >> {416, 0x0602}, {448, 0x0126}, {480, 0x0103}, {512, 0x0127},
> >> @@ -258,7 +259,7 @@ static const struct mpc_i2c_divider mpc_i2c_dividers_8xxx[] = {
> >> {49152, 0x011e}, {61440, 0x011f}
> >> };
> >>
> >> -u32 mpc_i2c_get_sec_cfg_8xxx(void)
> >> +static u32 __devinit mpc_i2c_get_sec_cfg_8xxx(void)
> >> {
> >> struct device_node *node = NULL;
> >> u32 __iomem *reg;
> >> @@ -287,7 +288,8 @@ u32 mpc_i2c_get_sec_cfg_8xxx(void)
> >> return val;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -int mpc_i2c_get_fdr_8xxx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> +static int __devinit mpc_i2c_get_fdr_8xxx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock,
> >> + u32 prescaler)
> >> {
> >> const struct mpc_i2c_divider *div = NULL;
> >> u32 divider;
> >> @@ -320,9 +322,9 @@ int mpc_i2c_get_fdr_8xxx(struct device_node *node, u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> return div ? (int)div->fdr : -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
> >> - struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> - u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
> >> + struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> + u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> {
> >> int ret, fdr;
> >>
> >> @@ -338,9 +340,9 @@ static void mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
> >> }
> >>
> >> #else /* !CONFIG_FSL_SOC */
> >> -static void mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
> >> - struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> - u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> +static void __devinit mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx(struct device_node *node,
> >> + struct mpc_i2c *i2c,
> >> + u32 clock, u32 prescaler)
> >> {
> >> }
> >> #endif /* CONFIG_FSL_SOC */
> >> @@ -529,8 +531,8 @@ static int __devinit fsl_i2c_probe(struct of_device *op,
> >> clock = *prop;
> >>
> >> if (match->data) {
> >> - struct mpc_i2c_match_data *data =
> >> - (struct mpc_i2c_match_data *)match->data;
> >> + struct mpc_i2c_data *data =
> >> + (struct mpc_i2c_data *)match->data;
> >> data->setclock(op->node, i2c, clock, data->prescaler);
> >> } else {
> >> /* Backwards compatibility */
> >> @@ -582,44 +584,35 @@ static int __devexit fsl_i2c_remove(struct of_device *op)
> >> return 0;
> >> };
> >>
> >> +static struct mpc_i2c_data __devinitdata mpc_i2c_data_52xx = {
> >> + .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct mpc_i2c_data __devinitdata mpc_i2c_data_8313 = {
> >> + .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct mpc_i2c_data __devinitdata mpc_i2c_data_8543 = {
> >> + .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
> >> + .prescaler = 2,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct mpc_i2c_data __devinitdata mpc_i2c_data_8544 = {
> >> + .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
> >> + .prescaler = 3,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> static const struct of_device_id mpc_i2c_of_match[] = {
> >> - {.compatible = "mpc5200-i2c",
> >> - .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
> >> - .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
> >> - },
> >> - },
> >> - {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c",
> >> - .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
> >> - .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
> >> - },
> >> - },
> >> - {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c",
> >> - .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
> >> - .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_52xx,
> >> - },
> >> - },
> >> - {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8313-i2c",
> >> - .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
> >> - .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
> >> - },
> >> - },
> >> - {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8543-i2c",
> >> - .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
> >> - .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
> >> - .prescaler = 2,
> >> - },
> >> - },
> >> - {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8544-i2c",
> >> - .data = &(struct mpc_i2c_match_data) {
> >> - .setclock = mpc_i2c_setclock_8xxx,
> >> - .prescaler = 3,
> >> - },
> >> + {.compatible = "mpc5200-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
> >> + {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200b-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
> >> + {.compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_52xx, },
> >> + {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8313-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8313, },
> >> + {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8543-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8543, },
> >> + {.compatible = "fsl,mpc8544-i2c", .data = &mpc_i2c_data_8544, },
> >> /* Backward compatibility */
> >> - },
> >> {.compatible = "fsl-i2c", },
> >> {},
> >> };
> >
> > Any particular reason you decided to move this all about?
>
> This was necessary to allow using __devinit[data] for the clock setup
> functions and clock diviver arrays above which results in some notable
> saving of memory space if the driver is statically linked into the
> kernel. If the data is defined within "mpc_i2c_of_match", section
> mismatches are reported.
>
> > Are you sure that __devinitdata is the right thing here, I've no idea
> > if there is currently any hotplug type support for openfirmware or
> > not.
>
> I agree that __init[data] is more appropriate for this driver even if
> many other non-hotplugable drivers use __devinit[data]. I will change that.
sorry, may have gotten confused by which type of __init is which, I
think __devinit is the correct one here.
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-27 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-25 20:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] i2c-mpc: add support for the Freescale MPC512x and other fixes Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-25 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] i2c-mpc: use __devinit[data] for initialization functions and data Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-25 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] i2c-mpc: add support for the MPC512x processors from Freescale Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-25 20:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] powerpc: doc/dts-bindings: update doc of FSL I2C bindings Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-26 14:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] i2c-mpc: use __devinit[data] for initialization functions and data Ben Dooks
2010-01-26 18:44 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2010-01-27 15:08 ` Ben Dooks [this message]
2010-01-27 15:14 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100127150801.GC6090@fluff.org.uk \
--to=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=Devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=Linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=wg@denx.de \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).