From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gra-lx1.iram.es (gra-lx1.iram.es [150.214.224.41]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C703AB7D17 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:43:18 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:25:36 +0100 From: Gabriel Paubert To: Joel Schopp Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] powerpc: implement arch_scale_smt_power for Power7 Message-ID: <20100129122536.GA11156@iram.es> References: <1264017638.5717.121.camel@jschopp-laptop> <1264017847.5717.132.camel@jschopp-laptop> <1264548495.12239.56.camel@jschopp-laptop> <1264720855.9660.22.camel@jschopp-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1264720855.9660.22.camel@jschopp-laptop> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Peter Zijlstra , ego@in.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 05:20:55PM -0600, Joel Schopp wrote: > On Power7 processors running in SMT4 mode with 2, 3, or 4 idle threads > there is performance benefit to idling the higher numbered threads in > the core. > Really 2, 3, or 4? When you have 4 idle threads out of 4, performance becomes a minor concern, no? ;-) Gabriel