From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CAEB7DA2 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:53:00 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF08CDEBCB for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([192.168.54.25]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LJel8clDngMH for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stargate.localnet (unknown [84.45.236.142]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860A1DEBAE for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:23:20 +0000 (GMT) To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel? From: David Goodenough Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:23:19 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201003161223.19238.david.goodenough@btconnect.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , OpenWRT has some fixes which adds the board descriptions for the OpenRB (ppc504 based boards). Is there any reason why these should not be merged into the mainline kernel? The fixes are all licences GPL2. If not do you want the original authors to submit them, or shall I take the OpenWRT specific bits out and post them here? David