From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com (e37.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e37.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC33CB7D9D for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:39:28 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e37.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o2GEbtha031728 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:37:55 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id o2GEdKDm198968 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:39:21 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o2GEd8jj005429 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:39:09 -0600 Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:39:03 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: David Goodenough Subject: Re: Can the OpenRB board descriptions be merged into the mainline kernel? Message-ID: <20100316143903.GK8963@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <201003161223.19238.david.goodenough@btconnect.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <201003161223.19238.david.goodenough@btconnect.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:23:19PM +0000, David Goodenough wrote: >OpenWRT has some fixes which adds the board descriptions for the OpenRB >(ppc504 based boards). Is there any reason why these should not be ppc504? I've not heard of that one. Is that a typo for 405? >merged into the mainline kernel? The fixes are all licences GPL2. > >If not do you want the original authors to submit them, or shall I take the >OpenWRT specific bits out and post them here? What exactly do you mean by "board description"? josh