From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michal.simek@petalogix.com,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:47:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100318154747.GA7767@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100318152250.21082.35352.stgit@angua>
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:22:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Both dev_archdata.of_node and of_device.node are duplications of the
> device.of_node value. This patch removes them.
Yeah, they're plain duplications since you introduced dev.of_node.
I wonder what was the problem with using dev.archdata.of_node?
Why dev.of_node is better?
Also, by using dev.of_node directly you have to introduce ugly
#ifdefs in the non-OF code (as in i2c patch), which you don't
need with transparent archdata and accessors, which you've just
removed:
> -static inline void dev_archdata_set_node(struct dev_archdata *ad,
> - struct device_node *np)
> -{
> - ad->of_node = np;
> -}
> -
> -static inline struct device_node *
> -dev_archdata_get_node(const struct dev_archdata *ad)
> -{
> - return ad->of_node;
> -}
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-18 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 15:22 [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 01/10] driver-core: Add device node pointer to " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 02/10] i2c/of: Allow device node to be passed via i2c_board_info Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 03/10] arch/sparc: Always use 'struct device.of_node' to get device node pointer Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 04/10] arch/powerpc: " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 05/10] arch/microblaze: " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 06/10] of/drivers: Always use struct device.of_node to get " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:58 ` Jochen Friedrich
2010-03-18 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 16:59 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:07 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 17:10 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 17:12 ` Sean MacLennan
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 07/10] of: eliminate calls to dev_archdata_set_node() Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 08/10] arch/powerpc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.of_node and of_devce.node Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:47 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2010-03-18 16:22 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:22 ` [V2 PATCH 09/10] arch/microblaze: " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:23 ` [V2 PATCH 10/10] arch/sparc: Remove obsolete dev_archdata.prom_node " Grant Likely
2010-03-18 15:35 ` [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node pointers in struct device Grant Likely
2010-03-23 6:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-03-23 7:06 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100318154747.GA7767@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).