* [v2 PATCH] of/flattree: Fix unhandled OF_DT_NOP tag when unflattening the device tree
@ 2010-03-19 20:01 Grant Likely
2010-03-20 0:24 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-03-19 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss, benh, monstr, linuxppc-dev
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE were not. My firmware NOPs out
entire nodes depending on various environment parameters.
of_scan_flat_dt already handles NOP more generally.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
---
v2 - adapted to new location of unflatten_dt_node().
Jason, please test against 2.6.34-rc1
drivers/of/fdt.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
index 406757a..dee4fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
+++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
@@ -376,8 +376,11 @@ unsigned long __init unflatten_dt_node(unsigned long mem,
if (!np->type)
np->type = "<NULL>";
}
- while (tag == OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE) {
- mem = unflatten_dt_node(mem, p, np, allnextpp, fpsize);
+ while (tag == OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE || tag == OF_DT_NOP) {
+ if (tag == OF_DT_NOP)
+ *p += 4;
+ else
+ mem = unflatten_dt_node(mem, p, np, allnextpp, fpsize);
tag = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)(*p));
}
if (tag != OF_DT_END_NODE) {
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [v2 PATCH] of/flattree: Fix unhandled OF_DT_NOP tag when unflattening the device tree
2010-03-19 20:01 [v2 PATCH] of/flattree: Fix unhandled OF_DT_NOP tag when unflattening the device tree Grant Likely
@ 2010-03-20 0:24 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2010-03-20 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev, monstr
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 02:01:49PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
>
> NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
> OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE were not. My firmware NOPs out
> entire nodes depending on various environment parameters.
>
> of_scan_flat_dt already handles NOP more generally.
Fwiw, there's a test program in the libfdt/dtc tree called "nopulate"
which will liberally spread NOPs through a device tree blob (one
between every other tag), which might be useful for testing this
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-20 0:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-19 20:01 [v2 PATCH] of/flattree: Fix unhandled OF_DT_NOP tag when unflattening the device tree Grant Likely
2010-03-20 0:24 ` David Gibson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).